What does Fanon say about violence?

What does Fanon say about violence?

In this sense, Fanon sees violence as a "purifying force" (1963: 94). As a result, Fanon thinks that violence may be able to treat some of the mental illnesses of colonial people. Despite finding the potential in violence, Fanon believes that it should not be employed carelessly or as an aim in itself. Rather, he says that violence should only be used as a last resort when other means have failed.

He also states that violence is an intrinsic part of colonialism and that without it the colony will not develop. For Fanon, violence is necessary for the preservation of society; without it, humanity will be lost. He argues that without violence, there can be no freedom for any colonized person because they will always be dominated by their oppressors.

Thus, for Fanon, violence is useful and effective in the struggle against oppression. However, it is also important to understand its consequences so that these cannot be felt by the oppressed.

What is the main argument of Frantz Fanon’s concerning violence?

In justification of colonized peoples' use of violence, Fanon contended that human beings who are not deemed such (by the colonizer) are not bound by standards that pertain to humanity in their attitude toward the colonizer. The French government suppressed his book. However, it did not stop him from continuing his work on racism and violence.

For Fanon, violence is an essential part of the revolutionary process because it is the only way that oppressed people can free themselves from their oppressors.

However, he also believed that violence should be used with caution because any act of violence will result in more violence being done to you. This is why he advocated non-violence as a means of fighting oppression.

Furthermore, Fanon believed that violence cannot be justified by claiming that one is acting in self-defense or in order to save one's life. Any person who uses these arguments has no right to violence; instead, they are merely demonstrating that they have been colonized mentally.

Finally, Fanon argued that violence cannot be justified by claiming that it is necessary for the survival of mankind. Although this may be true for some forms of violence, it does not apply to colonialism because the colonial system was designed to destroy the indigenous culture and replace it with the culture of the colonizers. Therefore, there is no need for violence under colonialism since it can be replaced by other means if necessary.

When did Fanon write about violence?

The video is grounded on Martinican psychiatrist and anti-colonial thinker Frantz Fanon's controversial article Concerning Violence from his 1961 book The Wretched of the Earth, which relies on apparently lost footage from Swedish archives. The documentary includes an interview with former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, who discusses how he interpreted some of Fanon's ideas while working under him at the police department.

In the article, Fanon argues that violence is intrinsic to colonialism and that the only way for colonized people to liberate themselves is through violent revolt. He also states that violence is also necessary for workers to be liberated from their oppressors.

He came to this conclusion after analyzing European colonization practices in Africa and Asia. He argued that because African tribes would often attack colonies for supplying them with weapons, violence was an important part of African culture before colonialism. However, once colonists brought firepower to bear, they were able to force Africans into submission by terrorizing them with violence.

For Fanon, this showed that violence was not only useful for subduing colonial subjects but also essential for their liberation.

However, he also believed that violence should be used sparingly since it can turn opponents against you, causing more violence to ensue. This can lead to a "vicious cycle" that could destroy your own movement if not checked.

What did Fanon say about colonizers and violence?

The colonizers may present lofty arguments and beautiful speeches, but "when the colonized hear a discourse on Western civilization, they draw their machetes!" argues Fanon. Though colonizers may not agree with what Fanon has to say, colonized people all around the world have found it to be very motivating. After all, who doesn't want to cut their oppressor's power over them?

In The Wretched of the Earth, Fanon says that the colonizer uses three forms of violence against the colonized people: physical, mental, and cultural.

Physical violence is when the colonizer strikes the body physically, such as through torture or murder. Mental violence is when the colonizer attacks the mind of the colonized person, for example by sending them to prison or putting them through school. Cultural violence is any act or series of acts that causes damage to something sacred or valuable to the colonized person, for example by taking away their language or religion. Cultural violence can be used by the colonizer to destroy anything loved by the colonized people, such as their culture or way of life.

Fanon calls physical and mental violence "the immediate forms of oppression" because they happen immediately after colonization has begun. Physical and mental violence are used by the colonizer to keep the colonized people in line and to teach them not to fight back.

What does Quentin Tarantino think of violence?

According to Tarantino, "Violence is only one of many things you can do in movies." If you ask me how I feel about real-life violence, I'll tell you that I have a lot of sentiments about it. It's one of the most heinous features of American culture. Violence is cool in movies. It's not cool in reality.

In an interview with The Guardian, he said, "I don't believe in violence as a solution to anything. I believe in using your brain in place of your hand - or your two hands if you're a boxer - to solve problems around you."

He also believes that movies influence people's views on violence: "If you show violence on television when you're a kid, then that's what you think is acceptable behavior. Then you watch a movie and someone uses violence as a solution, so now it's okay for you to use violence."

Here are some other quotes by him:

On Hollywood's obsession with violence: "They like to show violence because they think it's exciting. But actually, when you show violence too often, it starts to lose its impact."

On why we need more films like Inglorious Basterds: "Because people needed to see something else other than violence used against them."

About Article Author

Donald Johnson

Donald Johnson is a law enforcement officer with a long career in the field. He has been working for the government for over 20 years and he loves his job. Donald never wants to retire because he believes that police work is too important to be left to just anyone.

Disclaimer

OnlySlightlyBiased.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Related posts